Sounds like a normal proposition, you pay my time you get all that I take in that time frame, you do the editing.
I was thinking more along the lines of someone shooting without being hired by a specific client. I did state potential client. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Looking at Pictures > Working in the ad biz, I've seen the full results of shoots from top > pros. Believe me, they include plenty of clunkers. Very little > editing is done before the goods are delivered. Why? It's part and > parcel of getting your money's worth. When you pay 50 grand for a > two day shoot, you want to see the whole program. No one is perfect. > Every photographer produces some bad shots. > Paul > On May 9, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote: > >>> Depends a lot on your purpose. >> True. I believe we were talking about pro photogs not camera club >> members. >> >>> A commercial photographer can over edit and lose sales because >>> someone may >>> have liked those photos. >> True, but I would then contend that he hasn't got a good enough >> feel for his >> potential clients needs. >> >> Kenneth Waller >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Looking at Pictures >> >> >>> Depends a lot on your purpose. A commercial photographer can over >>> edit >>> and lose sales because someone may have liked those photos. A fine >>> art >>> photographer needs to be more selective. A camera club member >>> needs to >>> make sure his photos look like everyone else's in the club. This >>> list is >>> more like a camera club than not, but is a bit more open minded. >>> >>> -graywolf >>> >>> >>> Tom C wrote: >>>>>> They've learned to largely relegate their emotions, prejudices, >>>>>> and >>>>>> personal attachments to the back >seat when deciding which >>>>>> images are >>>>>> worthy of display and may enjoy potential success. >>>>> I call that critical editing, IMO one of the best ways to >>>>> improve my >>>>> photography. >>>>> >>>>> Kenneth Waller >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's my feelings. One never becomes perfect at this but I find it >>>> coming >>>> full circle now. I can look throught the viewfinder and think, >>>> "No that's >>>> not it", or "Yes, maybe this it". >>>> >>>> To tell the truth, for almost any image I see displayed on this >>>> or any >>>> other >>>> list that is widely panned, it's the fact that it did not receive >>>> critical >>>> editting by the photographer, or if an attempt was made, it still >>>> slipped >>>> through. >>>> >>>> In short it's very often the ability to say, "I took this picture >>>> and it >>>> sucks", instead of "This picture is good because I took it". >>>> >>>> Tom C. >>>> >>>> Tom C. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
