Charles Robinson wrote: > On Sep 20, 2007, at 7:00, mike wilson wrote: > >> This operation was brought up some time ago. I asked than and ask >> now, "If they can buffer 24fps indefinitely, how come we are stuck >> with a measly dozen or so at maybe 2fps?" >> > > Answer: Because no individual DSLR owner wants to pay what it would > cost, nor carry what it would weigh! > > (That's my best guess anyways) > > I didn't read the article, but what does equipment with that kind of > capabilities cost? > The body alone is $17,500 US. The least expensive lens they have listed is a 300/2.8 for $4,950. http://www.red.com/store I'm ordering mine right now!
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
