Are you sure it's not 126 film? Paul On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before. >> >> I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some >> negatives. They'd been processed by another store in our chain, >> and she >> had the index print. I wrote down the frame numbers from the index >> print >> and how many of each she wanted on the inside flap of one of our 4x6 >> print wallets and left it for my relief to print. >> >> Got to work today, and there's a note that there's no numbers so >> the lab >> operator didn't know what to print. >> >> Before I started making a fuss, I looked at the negatives, and lo & >> behold, there's no edge print whatsoever; no frame numbers, no film >> identifiers ... NADA! >> >> Had to have been C-41 film, 'cause that's all our labs do. Looked >> like >> regular 35 mm, but there's nothing on the negative except the >> customer's >> images. >> >> Anyone have thoughts on this? > > May it have been a cheap film containing 35mm movie film stock? > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
