In a message dated 10/7/2007 1:30:59 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here you go, read the docket!
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-scdce/case_no-2:2007cv03264/case_id-153 215/ ============= It's not clear if he was on the property when he photographed it. If he wasn't, then no problem. If someone's property is visible from a public place then it wouldn't be trespass and he could photograph it. As far as copyright goes, I think a building has to be officially trademarked before that can be brought into it. And frank might know, but doesn't tresspass have to be dealt with at the time, not retroactively? Haven't we had threads about this sort of thing before? Marnie aka Doe <yawn> --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
