In a message dated 10/7/2007 9:54:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What worries me more than anything, is the assumption that you can get redress for other wrongs under copyright law. As a copyright case this should have been filed in the circular file already. It should have never gotten to a docket. As a trespass case it should be in another court, (and yes you can charge trespass after the fact, you just need some proof, if there was no way for the photo to have been made any other way that should be proof enough to make the accusation anyway).
============ Okay. I agree re copyright. Even though filed, I don't see how they have a chance in hell of winning. Marnie --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
