> 
> From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/10/19 Fri PM 01:17:23 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
> 
> Comments on the T34 from somewhere in my memory suggest it was better
> because of wider treads.  It was more able to negotiate soft ground.
> (maybe from 900 Days - the Seige of Leningrad) (The Russians built
> those tanks while the Germans shelled the factory!)
> Regards, Bob S.

Probably more that it weighed a lot less then the PanzerV.  I think that one 
came out of the factory about 30% heavier than design weight.

> 
> 
> On 10/19/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 06:16:54 GMT
> > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> > > Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
> > >
> > > The arms of Krupp is not entirely correct. The invasion of France was
> > > carried out using a large number of "training" tanks, (Panzer I and II's
> > > which had very small guns and light armor, the I in fact had no gun at
> > > all in the heavy weapon category, it was armed with twin .30 cal,
> > > (7.62mm) machine guns), there weren't enough of any front line German
> > > tanks to go around, and large numbers of Czech Tanks were pressed into
> > > service. A number of weapons thought to be quintessentially German were
> > > really of Czech origin. Russian Tanks were never that much better than
> > > German, in fact the vaunted T34 while a very good tank was most
> > > effective because of it's large numbers not it's inherent superiority,
> > > it was actually a prewar (1937-38 or there about) design, that began to
> > > enter service in late 1940 to early 1941.. The Germans actually were the
> > > ones who created the mid war designs, the Panther and Tiger were both
> > > answers to the T34. If they could have been built in sufficient numbers,
> > > (the Russians out produced the Germans in tanks by somewhere between
> > > 10-20 to 1, most being the T34, because they were good enough), the
> > > Russian T34 probably wouldn't have the reputation it has today. ...
> >
> > Wahoo!  Tank thread!  Just been discussing this elsewhere..
> >
> > The PanzerV (developed to combat the T34) was, indeed, in some ways a 
> > better tank.  In fact, in only one way - it was much better armed.  In a 
> > direct confrontation it would beat both the T34 and the "Tommykocher" 
> > Sherman.  But...
> >
> > It was massively more complex and expensive to build.  It was also not 
> > designed well for field maintenance.  It had a petrol engine, making it 
> > quicker but much more thirsty then the opposition.  Finally, the slave 
> > labour that was forced to build it has a pretty good programme of sabotage 
> > going.  A recent rebuild of one found oil galleries not completely drilled, 
> > cigarette butts in oilways, handfuls of swarf in gearboxes.
> >
> > Once the T34 was rearmed with an equivalent artillery piece, it was more 
> > then a fighting match for the PV, which had never been a match for the T34 
> > as a functional fighting machine.
> >
> > >
> > > Bob Sullivan wrote:
> > > > Adam,
> > > > Based on the "Arms of Krupp" book, Hitler had the war machine designed
> > > > and under construction long before overtaking any Chechoslovak
> > > > stockpiles.  By the end of the war, the German tanks (pre '40's
> > > > designs) were outmatched by the Russian tanks (newer, better armored
> > > > designs).  Whether or not some resistance early on would have derailed
> > > > Hitler is pretty speculative.
> > > > Regards, Bob S.
> > > >
> > > > On 10/18/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> frank theriault wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 10/18/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Bob,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> It's an all too common opinion in post-Trudeau Canada.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> It's also not shared by all Canadians.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> The sad thing is that war ~isn't~ a "last resort" these days
> > > >>> (competent actors or no)...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> cheers,
> > > >>> frank
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ps:  what's Trudeau got to do with it?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -f
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >> As an aside, the history of WW2 would be a lot different if the 
> > > >> British and French governments hadn't used violence as a last resort. 
> > > >> There's a lot of evidence to indicate that a robust response to either 
> > > >> the Remilitarization of the Rhineland or the Occupation of the 
> > > >> Sudetenland would have resulted in a quick coup removing Hitler.
> > > >>
> > > >> It's certain that most of the tanks that rolled into Poland in 
> > > >> September 1939 were Czech, the Weremacht was in many ways an empty 
> > > >> shell until the takeover of Czechoslovakia gave the Germans access to 
> > > >> the Czech's stockpiles of armor and equipment.
> > > >>
> > > >> Violence is the last resort of the incompetent only because the 
> > > >> competent resort to it sooner. Of course, it is far too often used as 
> > > >> a first or second resort, which is tragic.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Adam
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > >> PDML@pdml.net
> > > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > > >> follow the directions.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Remember, it?s pillage then burn.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > PDML@pdml.net
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > > follow the directions.
> > >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
> > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > follow the directions.
> >
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to