Make that my existing 4x5 camera, the Graphic from 1952. graywolf wrote: > No thanks, I want to use it on my existing camera. However that is about the > price I would want to pay for it. > > Your thing I could do manually with my existing digital at no cost, but since > I > am not into stilllifes much it would not help me a lot. > > > > Sandy Harris wrote: >> On 10/21/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I want a full frame portable all in one back for my 4x5. It does not have >>> to be >>> high resolution, 4000x5000 will do fine for me. >>> >>> How's that for a dream? >> Good one. >> >> More realistic: how about a little robotic device that manages using >> a digital camera for panoramas? You want 4000*5000 = 20M pixels? >> Use a 6Mp camera, get maybe 2 Mp per shot after overlap. Build >> a 12-shot pano and you are over your spec. Going much higher is >> possible. >> >> The thing is already in beta. $279 >> http://www.gigapan.org/ >> >> In a few years, will the photographer who wants absolute top >> image quality be hauling one of these about instead of a view >> camera? >> >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
