In a message dated 10/24/2007 11:28:39 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Split images are less accurate with wider lenses, the shift is smaller and >aligning less precise. No split image is dead-on accurate and if that's a >requirement, a matte screen and a magnifier are the way to go. > >-Adam
=============== I don't want the split prism as much as grid lines, my horizons are often off. Often way off. And it seems to only way to get grid lines, at this point in time, is with a Katz Eye. And they only offer grid lines with a split prism screen. The split prism screen, well, shrug, I've gotten sort of used to NOT having it (since Digital), but it would still be very nice for macro work. I've never felt I focus manually as well without it as I did with it. Personally, I would like replacement screens, of all sorts, to available on all upper and semi-upper DSLRs. Even mid-range DSLRs. Marnie aka Doe :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
