[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 10/24/2007 11:28:39 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Split images are less accurate with wider lenses, the shift is smaller and >> aligning less precise. No split image is dead-on accurate and if that's a >> requirement, a matte screen and a magnifier are the way to go. >> >> -Adam > > =============== > I don't want the split prism as much as grid lines, my horizons are often > off. Often way off. And it seems to only way to get grid lines, at this > point > in time, is with a Katz Eye. And they only offer grid lines with a split > prism > screen. The split prism screen, well, shrug, I've gotten sort of used to NOT > having it (since Digital), but it would still be very nice for macro work. > I've never felt I focus manually as well without it as I did with it. > > Personally, I would like replacement screens, of all sorts, to available on > all upper and semi-upper DSLRs. Even mid-range DSLRs. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) >
The Pentax LL-60 screen for the D/DS has grid lines, I'm pretty sure the K10D has a similar screen available. The DL and K1x0D series are the only ones Pentax has chosen not to offer screens for. I do like grid screens myself. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
