Thanks for the feedback. Paul On Nov 11, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of >> the pics Lindsey and I chose to send to her agent. It's different. >> Rather than taming the highlights, I chose to let it ramp down from >> them. What say you? >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6628457&size=lg > > This picture would look better cropped about square to eliminate the > glarey highlight on the clock face and with a little work to remove > the upper reflection of the lights in the top right of the clock > face. The specular reflection bouncing onto her shoulder and chest, > causing the sharp shadows of her hair and the fold of her shoulder, > is also distracting and should be softened. > > The pose is a little odd: she's looking off somewhere and her eyes > are dark, which does not engage the viewer. For a modeling shot, I'd > be less inclined to use it. > > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
