Yes, a combination of flash and ambient. I wanted some motion blur in the shots of the bowlers (which proved to be a problem for other reasons), and I wanted the background to be lit. In the areas where the flash is most powerful it "drowns out" the motion blur. Paul
On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:36 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Paul, > I can't make out Dave's vertical banding, but can see the blur. > It confuses me because parts of the flash shot look sharp and > others not. > Were you trying for a combination of flash and ambient lighting? > Regards, Bob S. > > On Nov 13, 2007 6:20 AM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll >>> post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's >>> some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears >>> to create a pattern of any sort. >> >> Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest >> ladies. >> >> It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave >> >> >>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039&size=lg >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
