> >, and to get it right one must see. > > Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities.....
experience, and tools/techniques that lead to reproducable results? > > You're right, it's a hallmark of many pro's to check and review their > > images on the spot in order to correct deficiences, and in the past > > they spent thousands of dollars for the capability with duplicate > > backs, polaroid film, and in some cases duplicate bodies. > > Polaroids were almost exclusively used in the studio to check lighting > and whatnot, and often that was to satisfy art directors, not the > photographers themselves. (probably due to this discussion thread) I have been wondering about the impact of digital photography on polaroid... of course, that studio usage may have been only a small part of the total polaroid usage. and with digital you get the immediate feedback but (in general, I guess) still not the immediate print. I noticed that the passport photos that used to be made using polaroids now also just come out of a printer these days. Axel. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
