> >>, and to get it right one must see. > > Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities.....
Certainly, one would have confidence.... but that confidence does not negate human error or the fact that the camera itself is not a perfect device. The ability to see a captured image immediately after exposure, is to a photographer, probably the single largest advantage offered by the technology. Tom C. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: Re: A question about chimping > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:36:00 -0600 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom C" > Subject: Re: A question about chimping > > > >> >>, and to get it right one must see. > > Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities..... >> >> You're right, it's a hallmark of many pro's to check and review their >> images on the spot in order to correct deficiences, and in the past they >> spent thousands of dollars for the capability with duplicate backs, >> polaroid film, and in some cases duplicate bodies. > > Polaroids were almost exclusively used in the studio to check lighting and > whatnot, and often that was to satisfy art directors, not the > photographers themselves. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
