Thanks Dave. >...is there something that says who's photo it is.??
No, not in the voting stage. Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery > Ken, your 600mm shots have always amazed me with composure and > clarity. I never know whose photo i'm voting on, is there something > that says who's photo it is.?? > > Dave > > On Dec 15, 2007 3:17 PM, Ken Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >Dramatic landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to dominate >> >these >> > days. >> >> Last time I looked there were around 20 images posted & taken with a 600. >> I >> had a majority of them. >> I've recently submitted a few more taken with the 600, all were rejected. >> >> I'm beginning to think that somehow posters with a lot of accepted images >> are being rejected outright. >> >> Kenneth Waller >> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery >> >> >> > You may be right - what I have seen lately is similar. Dramatic >> > landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to dominate these >> > days. People, slice of life and such don't seem to do very well. My >> > hit rate these days is down to about 1 in 30 - even though I have two >> > in the collection and 53 in the gallery. >> > >> > -- >> > Bruce >> > >> > >> > Friday, December 14, 2007, 3:54:53 PM, you wrote: >> > >> > PS> I've found it's very hard to get a kid pic in the gallery. I've >> > only >> > PS> made it with one of hers. The blowing bubbles shot was rejected in >> > PS> one day. Based on what PDML members indicated in terms of recent >> > PS> accepted pics, only dramatic landscapes make the grade. I rarely >> > PS> submit any more. In part, because most of my recent work has been >> > PS> commercial, but the odds are not favorable for most of what I >> > shoot. >> > PS> Paul >> > PS> On Dec 14, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: >> > >> >>> Hello Jack, >> >>> >> >>> speed of rejection - about 1 day. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> Bruce >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Friday, December 14, 2007, 3:31:13 PM, you wrote: >> >>> >> >>> JD> Bruce, why do not think it was not seen by the judges? >> >>> >> >>> JD> Jack >> >>> JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather >> >>>>> surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid with lollipop >> >>>>> was declined without even making it to the judges. I would have >> >>>>> thought it would have made it through the peer judging. Let me >> >>>>> know >> >>>>> if I am perceiving wrong...thanks. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Here is the photo: >> >>>>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/rivercats_0004a.htm >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Best regards, >> >>>>> Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
