Thiboiulle Thanks for this. I've put on my special VDU focal length glasses and blown up the images a bit on my 24" monitor. So that they just fit on the screen. Here are my completely unscientific conclusions.
C*n** 40D. Rubbish, does not resolve the detail on the flower on the shoulder even at low ISO. Sony, surprisingly good maybe 1-2 stops worse than the Pentax but the noise looks different Nikon D300. Surprisingly poor. Around 2 stops worse than the Pentax. Useless above ISO800. It costs how much??! Nikon D3 What a marketing con. ISO 25000 looks unusable. Obviously dreamt up by the same marketing team who gave us burst mode in the K20D. Detail is one to two stops better than the K20D. Must be why it is two to three times more expensive!! Would have been nice to see the K10D and a Canon full frame to complete the picture. However I'll be sticking to my K10D and the 67II for the time being Many thanks Peter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
