FWIW, the Canon 17-85 performed very poorly in the current dpreview lens tests.
Jack --- Peter Fairweather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christian > The Canon appears to be with the 17-85 lens at f/8. I can't find > anywhere particularly sharp. Poor control as you suggest. Also colour > fringing between black and white lines in the photo, could also be > lens related > > Adam > Be interesting to see your Nikon picture in colour. What passes for > atmosphere in BandW can look just plain wrong in colour. > > Peter > > > On 08/02/2008, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter Fairweather wrote: > > > > > > C*n** 40D. Rubbish, does not resolve the detail on the flower on > the > > > shoulder even at low ISO. > > > > It was out of focus to begin with. if you look at the original > full > > sized shot you can see that focus is on the near side of the doll's > face > > and hair. > > > > what's rubbish is the photographer and reviewer for making such a > > comparison without proper controls. > > > > > > -- > > > > Christian > > http://photography.skofteland.net > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
