Mark Roberts wrote: > Scott Loveless wrote: >> Adam Maas wrote: >>> The *istD. Overly small grip makes the handling inferior to the later >>> bodies. Slow write speeds and the necessity to drop out of shooting >>> mode to change ISO, WB or image quality settings comprimise it as a >>> camera as well. >>> >> I think I'm odd-man-out here. While the K10D was plenty comfy, I found >> the *istD much more pleasant to hold. > > I don't think you're odd (well, about this, anyway...) > I prefer the feel if the ist-D to the K10D. It's a slight preference, > though; not enough to bother me. > > What *did* bother me was the control layout of the MZ-S. I *loved* the > overall ergonomics, but missed the dual-control-wheel setup of the PZ-1p > (and ist-D and K10d). If the MZ-S had that control setup I *never* would > have sold it. Ever. It would have been my "film camera to keep forever". > > I've only used an MZ-S a couple of times and found the layout to be non-intuitive. Actually reading the manual would have helped. The PZ-1 has a wonderful interface, though. I only wish it was built to the same standards as the MZ-S.
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
