> That's nice, but they need to start putting some faster primes on the market.
Certainly true. > There isn't much advantage in buying a 35mm f/2.8 lens when the 16-50 is also > an f/2.8, unless all you are going > to do with the 35mm lens is macro work at closer ranges than the 16-50 will > allow. Unless you like primes and prefer lenses without much vignetting or distortion although you might argue that "It can be processed under PS anyway". -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
