I felt the same way with the FA20-35 ... until I had the DA21. Then my  
use of the zoom pretty much stopped as I found the prime to be that  
significant increment more capable a performer. A 20-35 plus a 70 is a  
remarkably complete kit for a tremendous amount of work.

Godfrey

On Apr 8, 2008, at 6:45 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
> But you're not a singular deviant . . . ;-)
>
> I have actually used the FA20-35 as my only lens.  Had the 40 as well,
> but never used it.  This lens just works well, all prime/zoom issues
> aside.  I keep thinking of getting the DA 21, but the FA20-35 is so
> light (and not much slower) that I'm not sure why I really need it.  A
> good kit for me would be the FA20-35 and either the FA 50 1.4 or the  
> DA
> 70.  The latter lenses are just so small there's no reason not to take
> them.  I like the idea of just having one lens, but I have to keep
> reminding myself that this isn't a game show and that there is  
> really no
> practical barrier.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to