Gads, I'm beginning to believe that I have the only non-defective DA*16-50 in captivity. Perhaps I shouldn't look too closely at it! ;-)
G On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think the DA* 16-50/2.8 is an aberration. All my other lenses > check out quite nicely. Some adjustment dials them in more > precisely, but they're all within acceptable range. Apparentlly > there's some problem involved in the manufacture of the DA* 16-50 > that sometimes results in a plane of focus that's not uniform. > That's a different kind of problem than front focus or back focus. > It can't be corrected with the controls or even with normal service > procedures. That being said, I'm not sure that a lot of shortcuts > aren't being taken in manufacturing these days. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
