Paul,

Does the LightSphere squash for packing, or does one
carry around a 10cm cup with an open bottom?

Rick

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> So far, I haven't found the clear lightsphere harsh.
> I'd like to have both, along with the tungsten and
> chrome-dome caps. But I think the clear will be the
> best all around choice for a wedding, where I don't
> want to have to switch. I have one booked about 4
> weeks from now, so I'll know a lot more after that.
> Paul
>  -------------- Original message
> ----------------------
> From: "Walter Hamler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Paul, assuming you are using the clear version, do
> you find the light
> > a little harsh any time?
> > I wanted to get the clear version but the local
> camera store only had
> > the cloudy one.
> > 
> > Walt
> > 
> > On 6/17/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As one might expect, the lightsphere shadows are
> more subtle and the lighting 
> > is more natural. I like that. However, the cloudy
> version eats quite a few 
> > f-stops. But for close-in work like this it's
> excellent. Nice shot, BTW.
> > > Paul
> > >  -------------- Original message
> ----------------------
> > > From: "Walter Hamler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Paul's thread got me to thinking. I have a
> Lightsphere, the cloudy
> > > > looking version. I have tried it on the Sigma
> 500 flash with poor
> > > > results that I attribute to P-TTL. May be
> wrong.
> > > > Anyway, today I purchased a Vivitar 283 and
> put the velcro on it to
> > > > attach my Lumiquest bounce hood. The initial
> tests reminded my again
> > > > why I liked the Vivitar and Sunpak flash units
> with the simple auto
> > > > feature.
> > > > Then I decided to see how the Lightsphere
> would react. Not bad, but
> > > > there are some subtle differences between the
> two. The attached
> > > > photo's show. I believe each is captioned to
> show which was which.
> > > >
> > > > Walt
> > > >
> > > >
>
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/gallery/4592986_mrB5J#315094136_KwVvH-XL-LB
> > > >
> > > >
>
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/gallery/4592986_mrB5J#315094132_wiZxw-XL-LB
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > PDML@pdml.net
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link directly above and 
> > follow
> > > > the directions.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > PDML@pdml.net
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link directly above and follow 
> > the directions.
> > >
> > 
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link directly above and follow 
> > the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 



      

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to