It's a good lens. Not a great lens, but a good lens. Wide open it's soft, as you might expect. At f4, it's useable, and it gets better from there. Paul On Aug 7, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Jens wrote:
> Thanks, Walt > Perhaps I should buy it myself. I already got the 200mm f4 and a > 2.5 135mm (yummy)... > I thought perhaps it was like the 2.0 85mm - not sharp below f.5.6 > og 8... Got rid of mine years ago. But I guess it's better than that? > Regards > Jens > > -- > Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. > > On Aug 7, 2008 21:30 "Walter Hamler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'll trade you a SMC 135 3.5 and a SMC 200 f/4 for it! :-) >> Walt >> >> On 8/7/08, Jens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Guys >>> Have anyone got good or bad "news" about this lens? >>> I've been asked to sell one at ebay. Is it a dog, average or >>> excellent? >>> >>> Regards >>> Jens >>> -- >>> Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>> and follow the directions. >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
