I have the K 135/2.5, and it is one of my favorites. The only other lens
I own that equals it is the K 85/1.8. The 135 produces beautiful
photographs to be certain, but it's value is partly aesthetic. It's a
magnificent specimen. Sometimes, when I've had a bit too much of the
single malt, and I just feel like admiring a camera, I'll mount that 135
on an LX, set it down on the table, and just step back and admire it.
Sick, isn't it? : )
Paul

Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:

> Hi gang,
>
> Since we are (almost...) back on topic, I'd like to share with
> you the joy that my newly arrived K 135/2.5 is giving me...
> I won this lens on eBay (from Germany) few weeks ago. The item
> was described "like new", but when I opened the box what I saw
> was a NEW K 135/2.5 put in a time machine and sent from the late
> seventies directly here (and now)...
> Not even a dust speck between the glass surfaces!
>
> I started to think that I don't need a 135/3.5, a 100/2.8 and a
> couple of 70-210/4, after all... Even the huge and solid 105/2.5
> Vivitar macro(like new too) recently bought seems a poor thing
> in comparison.
>
> If the pictures it takes compares to its shape and mechanical
> feeling, well... I'm excited!
>
> I should give a better attention to all the other K series lens
> auctions around eBay...
>
> Gianfranco
> (happy, even when I think about all the money floating away...)
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to