Scott Loveless wrote: > William Robb wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bob W" >> Subject: RE: RE: Define Monochrome >> >> >>> Up to you, of course, but Bill's notion about a substrate is mistaken. >> Without a substrate of some sort, you don't really have a picture, do you? >> I meant that the substrate is generally white, if that helps. > > Your white paper is gray. And your black ink is, too. Makes for an > easier finish to a ridiculous conversation about worthless semantics.
And the inks probably aren't even perfectly neutral in tone. In short, there's NO SUCH THING as a monochrome image! Whew! Glad we've put that to rest! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
