Dan, I have a fairly full complement of lenses, so I'll take a stab at it. I would pick the FA *24 f:2.0 and the FA *85 f:1.4. This basically covers a large part of what I shoot. I find teleconverters mostly useful on longer lenses, so don't know if I would bother here.
I would miss my FA *200 f:2.8 and my FA 100 f:2.8 Macro. You make it more difficult limiting it to two. Bruce Dayton Thursday, December 06, 2001, 8:18:45 AM, you wrote: DS> We haven't a good equipment argument make the rounds for awhile. DS> My question, DS> if you had to limit yourself to two (2) Pentax _primes_ and one (1) Pentax DS> teleconverter, which ones and why? (i.e. how would that combo support your DS> style of photography better than some other combo?) DS> Anyone game? DS> Dan Scott DS> [EMAIL PROTECTED] DS> - DS> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, DS> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to DS> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
