Well the K200D could indeed receive an upgrade for a very good reason: the base camera is damn good (just a K10D with a couple features missing) but the buffer/fps really is a joke, espcieally the ridicullous buffer.
Other than that the K200D is a very fine camera. On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:46 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do K200D or K20D need a replacement? What Pentax _may_ need is > something lower than K200D or higher than K20D. > > K200D Minus could be something like the Micro Four Thirds from Olympus. > Ergo a K bayonetted, interchangeable compact camera :P Like a Micro K. > > K20D Plus could be FF camera > > There are rumours about Samsung developing a Optical Viewfinderless DSLR > and also a FF sensor... > > .t > >> Adam, who said the new camera wasn't replacing K200D? :p >> According to current informations it would (supposedly) replace or >> compliment it between K200D and K20D. >> >> -- >> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
