Sure they would but I expect Hoya-Pentax to go that route more than before...
A least they do not market upgrade versions as full new versions (read...Canon-like). Personnaly, I do not think the K20D needs anything more than what it has already. But the K200D or an intermediate model would be welcome, even more if its size is more DS-like. On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:58 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well the K200D could indeed receive an upgrade for a very good reason: >> the base camera is damn good (just a K10D with a couple features >> missing) but the buffer/fps really is a joke, espcieally the >> ridicullous buffer. >> >> Other than that the K200D is a very fine camera. >> > > But wouldn't users would be pissed off if half year after they bought a > camera there is already a replacement? I am surely would be angry to > Pentax if they announce a K20D Super already with 'fixed' flaws of the > K20D (for example the crap Live View) > > .timber > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
