The third version, the f/2.8-4.0, is the one I have and it is quite good lens. It seems to be very under-rated too from what I've read on Bob Monahagn's website (http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/third/cult.html#steve). I suppose that is because of the variable aperture perhaps. In any event, there is a good discussion of the Vivitar Series 1's lens and this web site gives a nice history of them.....Anyone know where I SR1 200/3.0? :)
John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:36 PM Subject: Re: Self enabled > > While browsing one of our local camera shops today I came across the > > Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 that's been on their website for several > > months. It so happened that the owner was available today and advised > > me he would sell it for $99.00 US. That was enough for me to do some > > self enabling, couldn't resist. > > Which version, Bill - the first-generation with the 67mm filter > threads, or the second-generation w/62mm (the version I used to use a > lot)? > > Fred > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
