On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:22 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/22 David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2008, at 8:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >>> >>>> I still don't see the big deal of FF. >>>> >>>> I know people say then their 24 will be a 24. not a 35 equivalent, >>>> etc, but just do what I do. >>>> >>>> I step back a bit.:-) >>> >>> The idiocy is that a 24mm lens is *always* a 24mm lens. The focal length >>> only defines a field of view in the context of a format definition. >> >> I know that, was just trying to be funny :-) > > I thought it was funny.
Then you've been Nikonized then.:-) Dave B > > DS > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
