2008/10/22 David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:22 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/10/22 David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2008, at 8:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >>>> >>>>> I still don't see the big deal of FF. >>>>> >>>>> I know people say then their 24 will be a 24. not a 35 equivalent, >>>>> etc, but just do what I do. >>>>> >>>>> I step back a bit.:-) >>>> >>>> The idiocy is that a 24mm lens is *always* a 24mm lens. The focal length >>>> only defines a field of view in the context of a format definition. >>> >>> I know that, was just trying to be funny :-) >> >> I thought it was funny. > > Then you've been Nikonized then.:-)
I've found this whole thread rather amusing though. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
