> > Which is a pretty good description of the newer lenses which are also > stand-out performers. >
Not having to buy new lenses is one of the justifications for "needing" a 36mm x 24mm sensor. (I made an ironic shrug) Regards, Anthony > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Adam Maas > Sent: Wednesday, 22 October 2008 10:40 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Full Frame: what is it? > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> And also replete with tales of film-era lenses (like the Zeiss 21/2.8 > >> Distagon and the 21/3.5 and 21/2 Zuiko's) seriously outperforming > >> those new designs on digital. > >> > > > > The lenses named are uncommonly good lenses, the key word being > > "uncommonly". > > > > Regards, Anthony > > > > Which is a pretty good description of the newer lenses which are also > stand-out performers. Plenty of craptacular new glass as well as old. > > -- > M. Adam Maas > http://www.mawz.ca > Explorations of the City Around Us. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
