Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I guess notions of efficiency, productivity, and overall image management
to expand creativity and profitability are not viable for this user
community.
Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com
On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Dario Bonazza <dario.bona...@virgilio.it>
wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
That IS the restriction I'm speaking of. Because it uses a library
instead of a file browser I need to jump through that hoop if I want
to use a filesystem organization other than the one it wants. As
opposed to my files just being there in Bridge. Bridge is simply much
less hassle for me.
Agree. I don't like to be slaved by a piece of software, no matter how
appealing and performing it looks. A good software has to work for me,
not the other way round. For that reason, I keep clear from Lightroom
and as far as I can from it.
Dario
Godfrey, don't make general assumptions and take it easy. Can one or two
people have different needs from yours? For me, the extra work (and time,
and money) required by Lightroom and then getting tied to it forever is just
disturbing. Since I don't truly need it, I keep away. Do you like it? Is it
useful to you? Use it and be happy!
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
