Paul, How much is a lens worth if it's the one you needed to get the shot you want? Is Quality-per-use to be discounted? If each time you use the lens you are disappointed with its results, the lens may have a negative worth. OTOH, I would agree that it makes more sense for most of us to buy the mid-range unit. No real need to spend ALL the money on lenses that'll see limited use. Use some of that money to buy more gear and maximize it's potential! :)
Cory Waters Has a few low dollar lenses and nothing more. <Snip> > It seems unfair that frequency of use must dictate the quality that it is > prudent to buy, but I can't escape the math. <SNIP> > reputation for being optically excellent but mechanically mediocre would be > a good candidate for the infrequent user. > > Comments? > > > Paul Franklin Stregevsky - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
