I made tons of BW glossy prints for 25 years, some contact prints and used loupes on them. The good glossy paper was not that crude in resolution even after development. I have some contact prints made from 8x10 negs that the details look really sharp even under a loupe, way beyond human naked eye vision in the range of 300dpi. The maximum paper resolution was not always an issue.
JC O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) "Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson -----Original Message----- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:47 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K20D as Scanner ----- Original Message ----- From: "JC OConnell" Subject: RE: K20D as Scanner >I aint buying it, quality glossy BW (wet) photo paper did better than >12 dots/lines per mm. (300dpi) 300 dpi is near the limit of human >vision, the wet paper was way better than that. It wasnt marginal. Whatever. I've copied thousands of old prints. I know what I'm talking about. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
