Frits, I think that you should probably try Fuji Reala 100 and maybe Agfa Optima II 100. I have shot quite a bit of the Supra 100 from Kodak but find it to be a bit too contrasty at times. When it is the right film, it is very nice, but I am finding Fuji Reala to do a great job overall. I even shot a wedding with it recently and it turned out very well in some high noon contrasty lighting.
Bruce Dayton Thursday, January 03, 2002, 2:07:02 PM, you wrote: FJW> Now this is really bad news. Is there no film replacing this one from Kodak? FJW> Do I need to switch to Fuji or buy a lot of stock and freeze it? What Fuji FJW> comes close to this one? It was my standard film:-( FJW> Frits Wüthrich FJW> dick graham wrote: >> First Kodak eliminated Royal Gold 25, now RG 100 is to be terminated. I >> used RG 100 consistently for candid portrait work and other work that I >> wanted to blow up. Great skin tone and grain structure for a consumer >> film. Now it too is going, going, gone. Has anyone used RG 200 and how >> does it compare to 100 in terms of grain structure and skin tone? I have >> used Portra NC 160 but it is not readily available in my town and it >> doesn't have the color saturation I like for shots other than portrait >> work. The price was also right for RG100. I could go into Target >> and get a >> sleeve that held 3 rolls of Gold 100 and 1 roll of RG100 for $5.99 USD. >> >> DG FJW> - FJW> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, FJW> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to FJW> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
