> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Len Paris > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[4]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) > > > It is, however, sensitive to the reflectivity of the film itself > which seems to vary somewhat from film to film. > > Len Plus the reflectivity of the subject can "fool" it too. JCO - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Shel Belinkoff
- Re: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Paul Stenquist
- Re: Re[2]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Bob Blakely
- Woodmere camera Pentax equipment (www.woodcam.co... Antti-Pekka Virjonen
- Re[4]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Bruce Dayton
- Re: Re[4]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,.... Bob Blakely
- Re[6]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,.... Bruce Dayton
- Re: Re[6]: getting LX - worth it? (r... William Robb
- Re: Re[6]: getting LX - worth i... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Re[4]: getting LX - worth it? (repai... Len Paris
- Re: Re[4]: getting LX - worth it? (r... J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Re[4]: getting LX - worth i... Len Paris
- Re: Re[2]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Aaron Reynolds
- Re[4]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Bruce Dayton
- Re: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Paul Stenquist
- Re: Re[4]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,.... Aaron Reynolds
- Re[6]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,.... Bruce Dayton
- Re: Re[6]: getting LX - worth it? (r... Aaron Reynolds
- RE: Re[2]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Re[2]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,.... William Robb
- Re: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) Paul Stenquist