Ditto. The technical perfection of the recording/playback medium don't matter much compared to the "meat" of the music.
On 14/11/2009, steve harley <p...@paper-ape.com> wrote: > On 2009-11-13 12:17 , J.C. O'Connell wrote: >> You wouldn't say perfect or highest possible fideility is overrated >> if you heard some of the worlds greatest recordings >> in all their glory. > > please don't tell me what _i'd_ say > > i've spent a lifetime enjoying a wide variety of great live music; while > i understand fidelity and the limitations of digital (and analog) audio, > and while i'm somewhat awed by top-notch equipment and its output, i > have no problem with "good enough" for recorded music; good enough is a > holistic evaluation that everone will make differently -- for me it's > more about the expression and "heart" of the music than it is about > absolute fidelity; even with mediocre equipment and lots of background > noise i can really enjoy music; i think that sense of "good enough" > holds for a lot of others too, based on the prevalence of car audio, > iPods, etc. > > it's pretty much same with photography for me > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
