Not a lens as such, but the 67->K tilt/shift adapter would be a nice thing, even with 45mm as the shortest focal length (tilt/shift/fish-eye 35mm would probably be too much). It might even be possible with 645->K or 67->645. Basically this: http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mc-35mm-tilt-shift-lens.htm with a 67 mount on the front instead of a lens.
On 11/12/2009, at 8:08 AM, John Celio wrote: > With all the rumblings about the new D-FA 100 WR not being a lens anyone > wanted, I've been wondering: > > What is your dream lens that does not yet exist in the current Pentax > lineup? > > Rules for this question: > - Realistic lenses only. No 5000mm 2.8 Macro WR Super-SR SDM APO > Aspherical ED Extra-Crispy Tilt-Shift Low-Calorie Triple-SMC lens with > 24 aperture blades, a cherry on top and a pack animal to carry it > around. > - Describe just one dream lens. No "I can't decide between an 8mm f/68 > pinhole and a 76.4mm f/1.2 macro." One lens only. > - Explain why Pentax really ought to make this lens. > > > This should be fun. :) > John > > -- > http://www.neovenator.com > http://www.cafepress.com/jacelio > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
