Well I generally occur with P.J. Back when I was using it on film, 8+ years ago, not having the experience I do now, I thought it was OK-to-pretty good. But even then I started scanning my film and having a bit more control.
On a DSLR, I hate mounting it as opposed to a prime, but given the versatility, I have little to no complaints, especially given that I can sharpen an image in Photoshop at will. I doubt that anyone could tell that an image was taken with this lens compared to any other. Frankly I'd say you would get better than average results for a less than average price, and that makes it overall positive. Since my newly purchased DA 18-250 turned out to be a lemon, I look with chagrin on it's purchase and feel the 28-200 purchased in '98 for a lesser price, was a better expenditure of funds. Tom C. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:23 PM, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hated, (Ok, hate is too strong a word, so), despised it with film, pretty > damned good on a digital. > > On 2/24/2010 4:13 PM, Roman Melihhov wrote: >> >> Speaking from your own experience, how do you like that lense. Hope its >> worth to bid >> >> http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemnext&item=190374025449.html >> >> many thanks, >> Roman. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
