On 20/03/2010, Nick Wright <nickwright1...@gmail.com> wrote: > G, > > This is why I am so upset. I went to a "pro" lab and had expensive > "high quality" scans done. And I am just not happy with the quality.
It may be a bit late but I'll add my 2c worth in. Having owned and used way too many scanners all I can say re the quality of the scan that you linked to is that it's complete crap. You should be able to obtain far better results from a dedicated film scanner that's well over 10 years old. Film scanning is tedious at best but it's not too difficult to get a film image into the digital domain with good results. Like others have suggested I would use the premium dedicated film scan service suggested or simply save your pennies and look for a good value used Nikon or Minolta film scanner. Spending money to get the results you got is a waste of money. Cheers, -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
