Buttheads...
On 4/15/2010 9:05 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
What's wrong with it?
Well, it doesn't have an optical viewfinder for one.....
At least that's according to the UK magazine 'Digital SLR User' that
reviewed the K-x in its December 2009 issue. Surely they couldn't be
wrong. Could they?
See this link:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/K-x.jpg
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:29 -0400, "Steven Desjardins"<drd1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ok, so we're all having fun with the inexpensive little Pentax that
has this annoying habit of producing fine images. Why is that? Is
the sensor and electronics that much better? I'm just curious. It's
been a while since one of the low end cameras caused such a fuss.
(The colors have been an amusing touch as well.)
--
Steve Desjardins
--
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
