On Apr 19, 2010, at 14:30, Bruce Dayton wrote: > I just happened to try a few other shots at different settings - so I > can show you what it looks like. These are not shots that I was > planning to show as keepers, but they can certainly be a good > learning tool. > > These shots were tripod mounted using the built in HDR facility of > the K-x. > > Sample 1: > HDR2 > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00015.htm > HDR1 > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00016.htm > No HDR > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00017.htm >
HDR1 here appears to be a better compromise between balance and... fakiness. > > Sample 2: > HDR2 > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00020.htm > HDR1 > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00021.htm > No HDR > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00022.htm The differences here are not very linear - are you sure that 21 isn't HDR2 and 20 is HDR1? In any case, I think I prefer the one which was untouched! Thanks for the comparisions, Bruce. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
