Yup, I didn't do anything post except for size/sharpen. -- Best regards, Bruce
Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:33:50 PM, you wrote: KW> The HDR version gets my vote ! KW> That was all in-camera? KW> Kenneth Waller KW> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller KW> ----- Original Message ----- KW> From: "Bruce Dayton" <bkday...@daytonphoto.com> KW> Subject: Re: PESO - Folsom Lake >> Your wish is my command: >> >> Regular: >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00011a.htm >> >> In camera HDR: >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00011.htm >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Bruce >> >> >> Sunday, April 18, 2010, 8:35:52 PM, you wrote: >> >> PS> That seems to do a really nice job...I'd like to see the shot w/o HDR >> PS> for comparison. >> >> PS> -p >> >> PS> On 4/18/2010 8:22 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: >>>> This was taken at a local lake. Even though we were shooting at >>>> early evening, the lighting was too harsh to record the entire scene >>>> well. Some of you may be aware that the K-x has a built in HDR >>>> function whereby it takes 3 shots to bracket exposure and then merges >>>> them together. So this shot here was taken that way. I held it >>>> still on a rock for the exposures. If anyone is interested, I did >>>> take another shot without HDR - quite a difference. >>>> >>>> Pentax K-x, DA*16-50/2.8 @ 16mm >>>> ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/10, handheld >>>> >>>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00011.htm >>>> >>>> Comments welcome -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
