On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Miserere wrote: > On 27 April 2010 22:05, Graydon <gray...@marost.ca> wrote: >> > [snip] and the sensor won't be either Sony or Samsung. > > Which basically leaves us with Kodak, who only makes a CCD, not CMOS, > FF sensor. While I'm sure Pentax could do a better job with high ISO > than Leica has with the M9, I'd still much rather prefer a Sony > sensor. And why did you say Pentax couldn't rely on Sony for sensors? > The K100D and K10D both featured Sony sensors and provided (and still > provide in my house) outstanding IQ. Pentax have done fantastically > with Sony sensors, and I wish they'd never gone to Samsung. > I have no problem with the Samsung sensor in the K7. The rendering is excellent and the detail is amazing. I think the low noise at high ISO capability of the Sony sensor may be a tradeoff on lower ISO detail. And I don't know if it's a function of sensor, software or both, but the exposure control of the K7 is the best of any camera by far. Paul
> Cheers, > > > --M. > > > > -- > > \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com > > http://EnticingTheLight.com > A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
