On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Charles Robinson <charl...@visi.com> wrote: > I was at a concert this weekend, and came up with (among other things) a pair > of photos I couldn't decide between, so I included them both in the gallery. > > I usually only like photos which I can describe as being "reasonably sharp". > Now, when shooting low-light high-movement subjects such as a rock concert, > that's sometimes an unachievable goal. Nonetheless, this is the first blurry > shot I've taken which I actually like. > > So, I'm sorta curious: which do you prefer? The first blurry shot, or the > moderately-clear shot taken 5 seconds later? > > Blurry (1/15 sec): > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/honeydogs_firstave/content/IMGP1150_large.html > > Clear (1/25 sec): > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/honeydogs_firstave/content/IMGP1152_large.html
I do like the first one, but prefer the second by a fair margin. Surprised you all, eh? ;-) Terrific shot, BTW! cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
