On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 02:03 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > I am wondering about the > general optical quality between the systems.
If there is going to be a difference, it would be that the 67 lenses don't need to be quite as good to deliver the same image quality at the same print size. Therefore, if the two sets of lenses are absolutely equal in quality, the prints from the 67 will be better. Really, though, I have no direct experience comparing one to the other. I'm very pleased with the 67 lenses I own, and would have a hard time imagining that they could be better. Of course, I don't own Wheatfield's bow-wow Takumar. ;) Bruce, do you have any rental houses in your city that offer the 67 or 645n? I'd think that a weekend with one followed by a weekend with the other would help to break the deadlock, and also give you some negatives to compare at various enlargement sizes. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
