On 28/07/2010, Miserere <miser...@gmail.com> wrote: > In view of this, I think this camera would be ideal for someone who > does not plan on tinkering with images in post processing (as I > imagine you wife wont do). If you ever borrow it from her (which I'm > sure you'd never do in a million years) you could always shoot RAW if > you really wanted to.
Great review but your paragraph: "Below is a picture taken side by side with the Canon S90 (read my review here). As you can see, the body of the E-PL1 isn’t that much larger than the S90." made me wince! I really couldn't imagine keeping that E-PL1 in my back pocket daily as I do the S90, they really are worlds apart size wise. That's why regardless of its flaws the S90 is such an amazing camera, personally if I'm going to lug about something that needs to be carried outside a pocket I might as well just take my K-x. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
