That's disappointing ... its nearly the same size as the 280t. Guess I'll just stick with my original idea and get the Vivitar 2000.
Also, I don't recall the 280T having controllable manual power. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:22 AM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > Nick David Wright wrote: > >> I just hope it's as small as it looks. That gives me an idea. If you >> have time, would you shoot a photo of the 200T and 280T side-by-side? >> I used to own the 280 and that would give me a better idea how big the >> 200 really is. I'd appreciate it very much. > > http://www.mikeawilson.co.uk/temp/IMGP2543.jpg > > Max-sized file, I'm afraid. As you can see, width and height are not so > different. 280 is deeper. I would go with the larger flash. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- ~Nick David Wright http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
