I have a AF200T AF289T and Vivitar 2000, (bounce head), the AF200T is
the smallest of the three.
On 11/2/2010 8:48 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
That's disappointing ... its nearly the same size as the 280t.
Guess I'll just stick with my original idea and get the Vivitar 2000.
Also, I don't recall the 280T having controllable manual power.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:22 AM, mike wilson<m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Nick David Wright wrote:
I just hope it's as small as it looks. That gives me an idea. If you
have time, would you shoot a photo of the 200T and 280T side-by-side?
I used to own the 280 and that would give me a better idea how big the
200 really is. I'd appreciate it very much.
http://www.mikeawilson.co.uk/temp/IMGP2543.jpg
Max-sized file, I'm afraid. As you can see, width and height are not so
different. 280 is deeper. I would go with the larger flash.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
"His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral
bankruptcy."
-Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
