On Nov 5, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 5 November 2010 12:29, Jaume Lahuerta <jlah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
wrong link last one
Woops! Let's try again:
http://tinyurl.com/2vy7qjv
What I find amazing is how the Kx seems to outperform the Kr. And
at high ISO even outperforms the K5 in dynamic range.
If you lose a stop of dynamic range and a stop of SNR for every stop
of ISO, why not just shoot at the base ISO and underexpose?
Because pumping up the exposure in conversion or post conversion
generates far more noise and loss of dynamic range than does
increasing the ISO in camera. Been there, done that. Doesn't work.
Paul
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
